Department 7 · AI Agents for Business Formation
Design the Human in the Loop
Place human judgment where trust, ambiguity, consequence, or private data requires it.
28
Lesson 28 of 33 · one artifact
By the end
You will be able to place human judgment where trust, ambiguity, consequence, or private data requires it.
Enter the lecture
WATCH THE ARGUMENT BEFORE YOU USE THE WORKSHEET.
Starts at 29:52 · YouTube loads only after you press play.
Before you watch
Write what you currently believe about this lesson's question. Keep the note—you will revise it after watching.
Chapters used in this lesson
The idea worth keeping
Design the Human in the Loop
Human-in-the-loop is not a ceremonial approval button. The reviewer needs context, authority, time, and a defined standard.
Your turn
Design the Human in the Loop
One inspectable output
Choose three agent actions and define reviewer, evidence shown, decision standard, and timeout behavior.
Finish with: A human-review protocol.
See the transfer
THE SAME IDEA. TWO REAL CONTEXTS.
Professional example
A human verifies claims and sources before an agent publishes.
Clinician example
A qualified person owns every decision that could affect care or protected information.
Score your artifact
DOES THE WORK HOLD UP?
- Reviewer is qualified
- Evidence is visible
- No response fails safely
Keep this
Design the Human in the Loop
- Human-in-the-loop is not a ceremonial approval button. The reviewer needs context, authority, time, and a defined standard.
- A human-review protocol.
Your evidence: A human-review protocol.
Case-study checkpoint
THE SAME PRINCIPLE MEETS THREE DIFFERENT LIVES.
Jai
Jai acts as customer, reviewer, and system designer.
Anthony
Anthony is introduced as the experienced comparison for the next strategy layer.
Khizar
Khizar's over-scoped website and marketing offer is the negative feasibility case.